(ambiguous) to shun publicity: publico carere, forum ac lucem fugere.(ambiguous) credit has disappeared: fides (de foro) sublata est (Leg.(ambiguous) at home in one's native country: domi (opp.( Ecclesiastical ) IPA ( key): /ˈfo.rum/, įorum n ( genitive forī) second declension.Cognate with foris, forās, Old Church Slavonic дворъ ( dvorŭ, “ court, courtyard ” ), Sanskrit द्वार ( dvā́ra, “ door, gate, passage ” ) and Lithuanian dvãras ( “ estate ” ). through the door ” ), from *dʰwer- ( “ door, gate ” ). something enclosed by the door, or the place outside, i.e. “ forum” in Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Daring, Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, 2016.įrom Latin forum, from Proto-Indo-European *dʰworom ( “ enclosure ” ).įrom Proto-Indo-European *dʰworom ( “ enclosure, courtyard, i.e.institution, body Synonyms: lembaga, wadah.through the door ” ), from *dʰwer- ( “ door, gate ” ).įorum ( plural forum-forum, first-person possessive forum ku, second-person possessive forum mu, third-person possessive forum nya)
![optisystem diễn đàn optisystem diễn đàn](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/monmangtruyentaiquang-150513140642-lva1-app6891/95/optisystem-18-638.jpg)
![optisystem diễn đàn optisystem diễn đàn](https://img.dokumen.tips/img/1200x630/reader018/reader/2019122611/55cf9bbc550346d033a7342a/r-1.jpg)
![optisystem diễn đàn optisystem diễn đàn](https://media.store123doc.com/figures/000/256/hinh-dat-phan-tu-vao-main-layout-256262.png)
We hope we will get all the answer from forum, which we are seeking. And we will be so grateful to them who clarify our confusion. Answer from the OPTISYSTEM expert members will highly encourage our purpose. Please someone help us to clear our 3 confusion, because our thesis will be depending on the 3 answer of those above questions.
![optisystem diễn đàn optisystem diễn đàn](https://edwardsync.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3326792_2.jpg)
Are we correct?Īnyway, below I rearrange above question sequentially again,ġ)To circulate a signal in a loop such as “abcda” do we need optical delay and iteration?Ģ)To view the each output which is created by each circulation of the signal, do we need to change the signal index?ģ)So can we say that for a loop diagram such as figure:1, number of circulation of a signal is equal to number of iteration? Or we use 20 iterations, is it means that, the pulse circulate 20 times within the loop? However according to the “tutorial-1 Lesson 5: Bidirectional Simulation - Working with multiple iterations” we use the iteration and optical delay to circulate the pulse within the loop.
#Optisystem diễn đàn pdf#
Such as output should be look like figure:2 but we have got this output of figure:3 (see in pdf file), then one of my group members said that, to see output of each circulation of pulse (because according to the theory if the pulse makes one circulation with in the loop “abcda”, an output pulse will be detected, so for each circulation we will get a pulse) we may need to change the number of iteration by changing the signal index parameter, but he is not 100% sure. But still we are confused about some matter.
#Optisystem diễn đàn generator#
However we have able to create a pulse generator which generates single pulse only for first iteration or when signal index is zero, and in other iteration it produce null signal. We are working to recreate a diagram in optisystem-7 which I have told earlier in this forum ( ). Finally we (me and my 3 group members) have almost able to design our optical layout for our BSc thesis.